wiki home
Online Reference
Dictionary, Encyclopedia & more
by:

photo gallery

edu:topics:complex:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
edu:topics:complex:start [2017/11/10 15:14]
simon
edu:topics:complex:start [2018/02/21 23:51] (current)
simon [notes]
Line 125: Line 125:
  
 But for others there needs to be something else. But for others there needs to be something else.
- 
----- 
- 
-perhaps re the lesson connecting to Argand Plane, use: 
- 
-<​quote></​quote>​http://​www.math.uri.edu/​~merino/​spring06/​mth562/​ShortHistoryComplexNumbers2006.pdf<​quote>​ 
-There are indications that Gauss had been in possession of the geometric representation of complex numbers since 1796, but it went unpublished until 1831, when he submitted his ideas to the Royal Society of Gottingen. Gauss introduced the term complex number 
- 
-<​quote>​If this subjet has hitherto been considered from the wrong viewpoint and thus enveloped in mystery and surrounded by darkness, it is largely an unsuitable terminology which should be blamed. Had +1, -1 and 
-√ −1, instead of being 
-called positive, negative and imaginary (or worse still, impossible) unity, been given the names say,of direct, inverse and lateral unity, there would hardly have been any scope for such obscurity. 
-</​quote></​quote>​ 
  
 ---- ----
Line 163: Line 151:
  
 making 25 − (−15) which is +15. Hence this product is 40. making 25 − (−15) which is +15. Hence this product is 40.
 +</​quote></​quote>​
 +
 +----
 +
 +perhaps re the lesson connecting to Argand Plane, use:
 +
 +<​quote></​quote>​http://​www.math.uri.edu/​~merino/​spring06/​mth562/​ShortHistoryComplexNumbers2006.pdf<​quote>​
 +There are indications that Gauss had been in possession of the geometric representation of complex numbers since 1796, but it went unpublished until 1831, when he submitted his ideas to the Royal Society of Gottingen. Gauss introduced the term complex number
 +
 +<​quote>​If this subjet has hitherto been considered from the wrong viewpoint and thus enveloped in mystery and surrounded by darkness, it is largely an unsuitable terminology which should be blamed. Had +1, -1 and
 +√ −1, instead of being
 +called positive, negative and imaginary (or worse still, impossible) unity, been given the names say,of direct, inverse and lateral unity, there would hardly have been any scope for such obscurity.
 +</​quote></​quote>​
 +
 +----
 +just like calculus was re-defined in terms of limits to eliminate "​impossible"​ infinities, so
 +complex numbers are redefined considering groups and sets ... but this requires a great deal more theory: ​
 +<​quote></​quote>​http://​www.math.uri.edu/​~merino/​spring06/​mth562/​ShortHistoryComplexNumbers2006.pdf<​quote>​
 +Augustin-Louis Cauchy (1789-1857) initiated complex function theory in an 1814 memoir
 +submitted to the French Acad´emie des Sciences. The term analytic function was not
 +mentioned in his memoir, but the concept is there. The memoir was published in 1825.
 +Contour integrals appear in the memoir, but this is not a first, apparently Poisson had
 +a 1820 paper with a path not on the real line. Cauchy constructed the set of complex
 +numbers in 1847 as R[x]/(x2 + 1)
 +<​quote>​We completely repudiate the symbol √
 +−1, abandoning it without regret because
 +we do not know what this alleged symbolism signifies nor what meaning
 +to give to it.
 </​quote></​quote>​ </​quote></​quote>​
  
Line 201: Line 217:
  
 ====notes==== ====notes====
-[[edu:​resources:​schrodinger-life]] | [[edu:​resources:​gleick-chaos]] | galileo |+[[books:​schrodinger]] | [[edu:​resources:​gleick-chaos]] | galileo |
 copernicus | [[edu:​resources:​penrose-physics]] copernicus | [[edu:​resources:​penrose-physics]]
  
edu/topics/complex/start.1510287270.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/11/10 15:14 by simon